While O’Donnell laudably attempted to emphasis the audience’s consideration onand hopefully very last, Charlie Sheen trainwreck interview, courtesy of the tragic undertow that threatens to pull Sheen beneath for great, I was overtaken, not through the pulling around the thread, as well as voracious audience he serves. It did not make me unhappy, it designed me angry.
In relation to celebrities, we will be a heartless nation, basking within their misfortunes like nude sunbathers at Schadenfreude Beach. The impulse is understandable, to some degree. It can be grating to pay attention to complaints from most people who appreciate privileges that most of us cannot even think about. If you should cannot muster up some compassion for Charlie Sheen, who would make a great deal more capital for any day’s get the job done than most of us will make in a decade’s time, I guess I can’t blame you.
With the quick pace of occasions on the web and also the material revolution sparked from the Web-based, it is extremely painless for your technologies community to believe it’s one of a kind: always breaking new ground and doing things that no person has ever before accomplished just before.
But there are other kinds of company that have already undergone several of the identical radical shifts, and have just as fantastic a stake during the future.
Consider healthcare, for example.
We commonly consider of it as a substantial, lumbering beast, but in truth, medicine has undergone a series of revolutions inside past 200 a long time that happen to be a minimum of equal to people we see in technology and knowledge.
Less understandable, but however in the norms of human nature, may be the impulse to rubberneck, to slow down and look into the carnage of Charlie spectacle of Sheen’s unraveling, but on the blithe interviewer Sheen’s lifestyle as we pass it from the suitable lane of our each day lives. To become straightforward, it could possibly be tough for people today to discern the difference between a run-of-the-mill attention whore, and an honest-to-goodness, circling the drain tragedy-to-be. On its own merits, a quote like “I Am On the Drug. It’s Described as Charlie Sheen” is sheer genius, and we can not all be expected to take the complete measure of someone’s existence each individual time we listen to some thing humorous.
Rapid ahead to 2011 and I am looking to look into suggests of currently being a little more business-like about my hobbies (generally audio). Through the stop of January I had manned up and started to advertise my weblogs. I had put together plenty of distinct blogs, which had been contributed to by acquaintances and colleagues. I promoted these activities by means of Facebook and Twitter.
2nd: the small abomination the Gang of 5 on the Supream Court gave us a year or so in the past (Citizens Inebriated) essentially is made up of a bit bouncing betty of its personal that could particularly effectively go off inside faces of Govs Wanker, Sacitch, Krysty, and J.O. Daniels. Given that this ruling prolonged the notion of “personhood” to both firms and unions, to look at to deny them any suitable to run within just the legal framework that they were organized underneath deprives these “persons” from the freedoms of speech, association and motion. Which implies (once again, quoting law school educated friends and family) that both the courts must uphold these rights for your unions (as individual “persons” as assured through the Federal (and most state) constitutions, or they have to declare that these attempts at stripping or limiting union rights have to utilize to primary firms, also.
If I were smarter, I would have majored in economics, gone on to Wall Street, and become a modern-day robber baron. As it is, I am but a humble online food scribe. I do remember two big, basic concepts that stuck with me from my Econ 101 class in college, though: opportunity cost and economies of scale. I had time to think about both a lot while making homemade mozzarella over the weekend.
What You'll Need
I made my mozzarella from a kit. You may have seen these kits online or at more DIY-leaning kitchenware stores. Roaring Brook Dairy sells one ($18.50), and there's also Ricki's Cheesemaking Kit ($24.95).
I've used both over the years, and they're more or less the same. Both come with instructions, a thermometer, citric acid, cheese salt, and rennet.* The difference? Ricki's comes with cheesecloth but no gloves while Roaring Brook comes with latex gloves but no cheesecloth.
Really, though, if you already have an instant-read thermometer and are comfortable following a recipe off the web (here's one), you can gather the essentials for far less. Look for citric acid at health-food stores. You might be able to find rennet, again, at a more DIY-leaning kitchenware store (Brooklyn Kitchen in NYC, for instance) — or order rennet online from cheesemaking.com, where it starts at $6.50.
You'll also need a gallon of whole milk. As high-quality as you can get. The fresher, the better. And this is crucial: IT CANNOT BE ULTRA-PASTEURIZED.
I've made mozzarella with regular ol' grocery store whole milk and with fancy-pants family-farm, gently pasteurized, non-homogenized full-fat milk. Guess which one makes better cheese. The less processed one, yes.
The Process
I'm not going to make this a step-by-step guide, because there are plenty of those on the web. If you did not catch my link above, here's a recipe you can follow for making mozzarella. Peep the slideshow here for a sort of general visual overview of what you'll have to do.
Is It Worth It?
OK, so remember how I mentioned opportunity cost and economies of scale? While I slowly pressed the whey from the curd and dipped my hands in the painfully hot salted whey to stretch the cheese, I had plenty of time to contemplate this stuff.
The opportunity cost, of course, is the amount of money I choose to forgo in order to make this cheese. Say my time is worth X dollars. I could theoretically be making X dollars instead of making cheese. If X is greater than the cost of the cheese, it makes no economic sense for me to separate the curd from the whey.
(This all reminds me of an article on Slate by Jennifer Reese, in which she explored whether it's worth it to make certain pantry staples or whether you should just buy them.)
Personally, I did not find making this cheese worth it — especially given my lackluster result. Yes, there is an educational component to the endeavor. And I do think that it's worth it to make mozzarella once or twice to learn how it's done. Then go back to buying it from a good local fresh-mozzarella-maker. Which brings me to ... economies of scale. Your local mozzarella-maker benefits from this other basic economics concept. With all the equipment and know-how and time, it's easier for them to make large batches of curd -- thus cost and effort decreases per pound of cheese.
And believe me, after a couple hours of messing around for a less-than-softball size hunk of cheese ...
* Ricki's is vegetable-based rennet; Roaring Brook's makes no mention of the rennet source, so folks looking to avoid animal-based rennet might give RB a shout to find out which it uses.
Amid all the fanfare over new iPad 2 hardware, Apple’s CEO Steve Jobs boasted that the company has now paid out a cumulative $2 billion to developers for apps sold in the App Store. This comes just eight months after it announced developers had made $1 billion from the app store since the store launched in July 2008.
This is a huge number and highlights one of the reasons Apple is doing so well in this post-PC era. It’s not only building devices that embody the intersection of technology and humanities, as Jobs likes to say; it’s also creating an environment for developers to take advantage of these more personal and powerful machines. This vibrant community of programmers has helped push Apple’s count of apps up to more than 350,000.
The Asymco blog recently (and accurately) estimated that Apple had paid out $2 billion to developers over the course of 31 months, compared to the 34 months it took for record labels to make that much money on iTunes. This suggests Apple’s App Store is on a huge growth trajectory and shows why developers are still so loyal to the iOS platform. Even with some restrictions with the App Store, they have a better shot at making money there.
But the $2 billion isn’t just coming from paid downloads. Apple developers are also raking in money from in-app purchases, which have become a major revenue source for devs in the last year. According to Distimo, an app analytics company, revenue from in-app purchases both in free and paid iPhone apps was 49 percent last year, compared to 51 percent of paid download revenue. And that’s not counting any money that developers are getting on their own through advertising efforts.
The point is, Apple’s App Store is still the top destination for developers because it has robust revenue-generating options ensuring it won’t be shoved aside anytime soon. Android’s ascendance will certainly draw developers, but until it becomes easier to make money there, it’s not going to be the priority for most developers. Google, for its part, is improving the money-making potential of Android with an announced in-app purchase system and a new web store front. It’s also looking at expanding carrier billion options and trying to improve app discovery. But for now, Apple has 2 billion reasons why developers should stick with iOS, and that’s a lot more than Google can say. And as more users buy iOS apps, it further locks them in and makes it harder for them to switch platforms.
Related content from GigaOM Pro (sub. req.):
- How To Ride The Freemium App Wave To Success
- Will Killer Apps Affect Which Handsets Consumers Buy?
- How Carriers Can Crack the App Discoverability Nut
Source: http://removeripoffreports.net/ corporate Reputation Management
Fix your company's bad reputation today!
No comments:
Post a Comment